|
|
Performance Management
The UCLA Library conducts annual performance evaluations for all full- and part-time
career staff as part of its overall performance management initiative and our
commitment to providing both informal and formal feedback
on a regular basis to all employees regarding their job performance and ongoing organizational contributions.
Within the University of California, performance evaluations are required for full- and part-time career staff, according to the university personnel policies and collective bargaining agreements. The specific policies and contract articles related to performance evaluation are:
There are two types of performance evaluations:
Probationary - conducted during the probationary period.
Annual - conducted once a year for a specific time period.
Probationary evaluations are conducted within the first six months of employment usually in the 4th or 5th month of employment. LHR staff will notify supervisors of timelines for probationary evaluations. Supervisors may consult with LHR on probationary evaluations as needed.
Annual performance evaluations are conducted at the conclusion of the fiscal year and are a mechanism to acknowledge organizational contributions, recognize superior performance, identify performance or skills or knowledge gaps, and outline learning and development needs and goals for the future. Identifying learning and development opportunities to improve and expand an individual’s capabilities and capacity is also a part of the process. Performance evaluations are also a tool to address performance issues and deficiencies and allow the supervisor and employee to outline a concrete performance improvement plan for eliminating such issues and deficiencies. The annual written performance evaluation provides formal feedback and supplements the feedback given to employees daily or in weekly, biweekly, or monthly meetings.
Within the UCLA Library, annual performance evaluations are conducted under the following guidelines.
- An annual calendar guides the staff performance evaluation cycle. The calendar
is distributed to all library staff by the end of April. All evaluations are due in August.
- All full- and part-time career staff employees must be evaluated. This applies to both represented employees (those coved by collective bargaining agreements such as AFSCME, CUE, and UPTE employees) and non-represented employees (policy covered employees not covered by a collective bargaining agreement). Probationary employees are evaluated on the probationary evaluation cycle.
- The evaluation period is the fiscal year (July 1 to June 30).
- The evaluation is conducted by the employee’s current supervisor. If
the employee had another supervisor for part of the review period, it is the
responsibility of the current supervisor to seek input from the previous
supervisor. The input of the previous supervisor should be provided as a
written narrative and included as an addendum to the current supervisor’s
evaluation AND made available to the employee.
- The individual will be evaluated in relation to their job
performance vis-à-vis the job description and completion of their
individual work plan for the fiscal year that is being reviewed.
- All evaluations - completed and signed - are due to Library
Human Resources in mid-August (see specific date in annual calendar). The performance evaluation must be signed by the employee, supervisor, and the supervisor’s supervisor. The employee’s signature does not indicate agreement. The supervisor and employee should make copies of the completed, signed, final evaluation for their records prior to submitting to Library Human Resources.
- Department heads and supervisory Associate University Librarians may elect to review all performance evaluations within their respective departments or divisions at any step in the process. If they elect to do this, they may set internal deadlines within the library-wide calendar.
- All employee evaluations are reviewed by the University Librarian. In addition to ratings, specific, detailed, objective information on the employee’s activities and accomplishments is expected. The University Librarian expects the evaluation to provide information on the:
Context in which the contributions were made;
Significance of the contribution to the unit, department, and overall organization;
How the contribution furthered the library’s strategic plan and the unit plan.
In addition, the individual’s personal accomplishments and contributions to the library and profession should be included.
Questions about performance evaluation should be directed to Pat Hawthorne, Director of Library Human Resources, at 310.825.4562 or via e-mail
(path@library.ucla.edu) or to Araceli Bermudez, LHR Consultant,
(bermudez@library.ucla.edu) or Terry Leonard, LHR Consultant,
(tleonard@library.ucla.edu) at 310.825.7947.
Staff Performance Evaluation Cycle - Annual Calendar
Calendar of Due Dates for 2009
Information for Staff Members
Performance Management:
Planning for Your Annual Performance Evaluation
This PowerPoint presentation outlines the content presented in a two-hour session offered for all library staff in May and June 2009. The session covered the annual calendar and outlined the process within the UCLA Library while offering an opportunity for general questions from employees. In addition, the session provided information and tips for staff on how to proactively prepare for and actively participate in the annual performance evaluation process by outlining best practices.
Information for Supervisors
Supervisory Training PowerPoint Overview
Planning and Conducting Annual Performance Evaluations for Staff: A Guide for UCLA Library Supervisors, 2nd Edition
Sample Document - Internal Departmental Staff Performance Evaluation Calendar
What Employees Want from the Performance Evaluation Process
What Supervisors Want to Accomplish in the Performance Evaluation Process
What Management Wants From Supervisors in the Annual Performance Evaluation Process
Sample Document - Individual Work Plan
Sample Document - Individual Work Plan End-of-Year Status Report
Developing Performance Standards Exercise
Drafting the Narrative Evaluation Exercise
Examples of Performance Standards and Ratings
Maintained by LHR Staff
Latest Update: 7/1/09
|